Skip to main content

The post graduate medical Colleges, National health indices and an SOS

The West Africa College of Physicians concluded the second diet of exams recently. The faculty of psychiatry declared a pass rate of 13.8% at its part one membership exams (8 of 58 candidates). The faculty of public and community health recorded a 32% pass rate (23 of 70 candidates) Twice every year, candidates from all over the country converge in Ibadan and Lagos for the West Africa college of physician and National post graduate medical college exams respectively, each diet of examinations consisting of written, objective structured clinical exams, picture tests and oral/long case exams as the case may be. It is usually a very grueling and trying time for any candidate with psychological, emotional, financial and sometimes physical consequences. A minimum of sixty thousand naira (#60,000) is paid for each exam attended without consideration of transportation, feeding, and other ancillary expenses incurred. It is funded by the candidate after an initial one time sponsorship by the training hospital. A candidate may repeat the exams as many as seven (7) times. There are records of up to ten (10) times and over at one stage. Usually, candidates do not scale the first stage, and even then, meeting hurdles in each subsequent stages of the OSCE, Picture test and long case stages. Each must be passed independently, usually under stifling time constraints. It is pertinent to shed some light on the long case examination, already phased out by certain faculties of the college owing to its largely subjective nature. A candidate is assigned a patient for the purposes of the exam, and is to conduct an interview, physical examination and prescribe a course of management under harrowing time conditions. The candidate is to make an oral submission of his findings to two or more examiners who are usually less than dispassionate in their assessments. Mark you, less than 10% of these examiners have any degree in education, evaluation, assessing or any pedagogic training for that matter. It is under this long case that a lot of examiners excise their “pound of Flesh” as a candidate may be faulted in practically any and everything! Thus, a candidate who manages to scale through the first, second and third stages, is truncated at the last stage by an examiner who chooses to sleep during proceedings! A lot of candidates have been maimed as a result of the activities of these colleges with the active connivance of some training hospitals. Failing to pass these exams, a doctor is unable to make any professional advancement; he is stuck and sooner or later shown the way out of the residency program with no life line. He is unemployable as a specialist, and cannot proceed as a general practitioner. Medicine is touted to be an apprenticeship; so, if a candidate has to repeat a particular exam so many times, has he been properly mentored? Small wonder the high morbidity and mortality rates; the capital flight in medical tourism and the total loss of faith in the healthcare system. Such candidates who are frustrated out of the system for their inability to scales these exams, where do they go? Where do they start from with families and other dependants? What about the psychological toll on him? Something to with he has committed a lifetime of effort and suffered untold deprivation? A number of questions beg for answers; 1. Does this “high” standard that candidates are held up to translate to favorable health indices for the country- reduced morbidity, mortality and medical tourism to India and other nations? Capital flight? Is the nation any better off from the efforts of the Postgraduate medical college? 2. What does a failure rate of 87% connote? The trainers are not doing their jobs? The trainers do not understand what is required of them? Their candidates are so dull? Or is it simply a case of unregulated and misguided leadership? 3. What role does national interest play in the determination of proceedings, procedures, modus operandi and outcomes of the college? The national postgraduate medical college of Nigeria prides itself in having produced 4,000 plus specialists in over 30 years of existence and in a country of about 160 million people. Whose interest do they really serve? 4. What is the role of international best practice in the regulation of the colleges? Any peer review mechanism? Any interoperability or exchangeability with any other such international bodies? 5. Any validity and reliability studies on the mechanisms of these colleges? 6. Should each region or state not regulate its own postgraduate education, require and needs? 7. Who oversees the activities of these colleges? It is high time the House committee on health, the federal ministry of health, policy makers and other interest groups gave some scrutiny into the workings of these colleges in the interest of all stake holders, and the nation as a whole bearing in mind the various ramifications, dimensions and implications of the activity of these colleges on all and sundry. It is no longer acceptable that things remain the way they’ve always been. Indeed, the mark of humanity is the ability to adapt; to evolve; to meet challenges and peculiarities of the day, a peculiarity that once again challenges our resourcefulness.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nigeria 2015: What Manner of 'Change'?

The history of Nigeria is one characterized by multiple fits, starts and staccatos. Ours is a chequered history with continual disruptions by both military and civilian administrations. Successive military juntas, heralding a messianic dawn truncated whatever tranquil, stability and policy direction there was in a bid to 'move' the nation forward. Each one came to right some apparent 'wrong' perpetrated by the governments of the day. A messianic zeal and desire for the elusive eldorado, reinforced by an internal restlessness, impatience and intolerance of the masses accounts for the constant impetuousness to see the back of successive governments. Such changes were usually attended by wild street jubilations, rejoicing and anticipation of the new dawn- Uhuru! The history of disruptions isn't limited to the military administrations alone. A case in study was the Yar'Adua administration of 2007 -2011. A conniving, and vengeful administration not only put a
Nigeria's problems are diverse and numerous. 1. There are too many dissensions and schism in the south. A house divided against itself cannot stand! The fight for resource control, 50% derivation and true federalism should not be seen as a Niger Delta issue. It is a fight for justice, equity, fairplay and progress, and now is the time for all Progressive Nigerians, particularly the Southwest and southeasters to lend a voice. 2. Nigerians have not learnt the art, and latent power of Civil disobedience and protests. Protests marches, civil disobedience are the tools for the masses to assert themselves against a cold, detached group of elite who parade themselves as our leaders and representatives. It is the means to make our greviances known, our presence felt, and to effect change. Numerous examples of times and places where this worked abound. Recently in Bankok, the masses mobilized and grounded the aviation industry till their demands were met; Doctors and other healthworkers in