Skip to main content

Imperatives of a social security/welfare scheme in Nigeria

1. Nigeria is awash with money, floating literally, free and up for grabs by anyone who has the audacity, way and means to dip into the till. This is partly because these moneys are not tied directly to structures or programs which benefit Nigerians personally and directly, and little impact is made in the lives of Nigerians. 2.Also as a result of the huge budgetary allocation yearly to little more than white elephant projects, the avenues to steal are teeming, consequently the very high rate of corruption. 3.70% of Nigerian’s live in penury and poverty, mostly abject. 4.There is presently no benefit the average Nigerian derives from its government-no social welfare/security, no social housing and no formal (official) succor. Nigerians are left entirely to their own vices; if you die, you die. 5.Related to point number one is the need to curb crime and insecurity through a national fingerprint database. The data base will help the police for forensic purposes, crime detection etc. 6.A social welfare scheme will require registration, fingerprint identification inter alia to be operational. It will therefore, simultaneously provide an automatic real-time census, a fingerprint database, less opportunity for embezzlement of ?free moneys, poverty alleviation and giving Nigerians a sense of belonging, ownership and pride. 7.Introduction of a social welfare scheme will make an immediate and sustained impact on Nigerians. 8.Will boost confidence in government. 9.It will help streamline and focus government expenditure, resource control and facilitate fiscal prudence. 10.Finally, it will show the real essence of governance-security and welfare of the individual and collective.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nigeria 2015: What Manner of 'Change'?

The history of Nigeria is one characterized by multiple fits, starts and staccatos. Ours is a chequered history with continual disruptions by both military and civilian administrations. Successive military juntas, heralding a messianic dawn truncated whatever tranquil, stability and policy direction there was in a bid to 'move' the nation forward. Each one came to right some apparent 'wrong' perpetrated by the governments of the day. A messianic zeal and desire for the elusive eldorado, reinforced by an internal restlessness, impatience and intolerance of the masses accounts for the constant impetuousness to see the back of successive governments. Such changes were usually attended by wild street jubilations, rejoicing and anticipation of the new dawn- Uhuru! The history of disruptions isn't limited to the military administrations alone. A case in study was the Yar'Adua administration of 2007 -2011. A conniving, and vengeful administration not only put a ...

Another show of shame ....

However, the Action Congress (AC) has described as "infantile and diversionary" the bickering between the two chambers of the National Assembly over which of them should host the joint sitting for the President's budget presentation. In a statement by its National Publicity Secretary, Lai Mohammed, the party said the "mundane supremacy fight between the Senate and the House does not show that the legislators appreciate their role, which is to make laws for the betterment of the country." It said the fact that the bickering had already led the President to postpone his budget presentation showed that, "it is a great disservice to the suffering masses of our people who have continued to wait in vain for this do-nothing National Assembly to make laws that can improve their lives. "Nigerian federal lawmakers are perhaps the best paid in the world, yet they are turning out to be the least productive. The only time people hear their voices are when they are ...